URL has been copied successfully!
DAST vs AI Code: Why Dynamic Application Security Testing Can’t Keep Pace
URL has been copied successfully!

Collecting Cyber-News from over 60 sources

DAST vs AI Code: Why Dynamic Application Security Testing Can’t Keep Pace


Tags: , , ,

DAST vs AI Code: TL;DR

Traditional DAST requires 8+ hours for comprehensive scanning while AI-generated code deploys 10 times daily. This speed mismatch creates a fundamental security gap: most organizations run DAST weekly, leaving 70+ deployments unchecked between scans. The Contrast Runtime Security Platform offers a fundamentally different approach by embedding security directly into application runtime to detect vulnerabilities as they deploy and block attacks as they happen.

First seen on securityboulevard.com

Jump to article: securityboulevard.com/2025/10/dast-vs-ai-code-why-dynamic-application-security-testing-cant-keep-pace/

Loading

Share via Email
Share on Facebook
Tweet on X (Twitter)
Share on Whatsapp
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Xing
Copy link

also interesting:

  1. Cybersecurity Snapshot: Prompt Injection and Data Disclosure Top OWASP’s List of Cyber Risks for GenAI LLM Apps
  2. Want to be a cybersecurity pro? Use generative AI to get some simulated training
  3. The 14 most valuable cybersecurity certifications
  4. Smarter Threats Need Smarter Defenses: AI, APIs, and the Reality for Critical Infrastructure Security