The GenAI GRC mandate: From reporting to prediction: To counter a threat that moves at the speed of computation, our GRC must also become generative and predictive. The GenAI GRC mandate is to shift the focus from documenting compliance to predicting systemic failure.Current GRC methods are designed for documentation. They verify that a policy exists. GenAI GRC is designed for intelligence. It verifies that a policy is effective and anticipates when it will fail. I see this happening in three critical ways:
1. Contextual intelligence
We must use large language models (LLMs) to ingest diverse, unstructured data: supplier incident reports, geopolitical news feeds, dark web chatter, financial health indicators and code repository activity. An LLM can then contextualize these disparate signals faster than any human team, identifying emerging risk correlations.For example, the LLM might flag that a key semiconductor supplier facing sudden financial stress and seeing a high volume of unreviewed open-source code commits presents a high, immediate risk a signal that would be missed if analyzed in isolation, see McKinsey’s analysis on AI for risk management.
2. Continuous monitoring
We must implement a digital trust ledger. This isn’t a blockchain ledger, but a conceptual system where GenAI continuously scores and quantifies the trust quotient of every major vendor. This quotient, expressed as a dynamic risk metric, is calculated by automatically comparing vendor-provided documents against real-world external signals. If a vendor claims minimal technical debt, but the GenAI engine ingests a spike in their public-facing bug reports, the trust quotient dips, triggering an immediate, targeted audit.
3. Regulatory synthesis
New, complex regulations like the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) and the AI Act demand a level of synthesized compliance that manual teams can’t maintain. I use GenAI to cross-reference our supply chain dependencies against these global regulatory shifts instantly, identifying and prioritizing where a vendor’s failure means immediate, enterprise-level noncompliance.
Translating code risk into boardroom resilience: The biggest failure in modern GRC is communication. We take technical vulnerabilities and present them as technical problems. The board doesn’t care about the number of unpatched servers; they care about impact, velocity and shareholder value. My role and yours is to translate technical risk into strategic resilience.When presenting GenAI GRC initiatives, I advise CISOs to stop talking about cost and start framing the spend as strategic capital allocation.Instead of reporting: “We have 50 high-priority supply chain vulnerabilities,” I suggest you report on the risk velocity metric (RVM): “Our GenAI GRC framework indicates that the probability of a catastrophic supply chain interruption (costing $$X) has been reduced by 18% over the last quarter, moving this risk below the board’s acceptable threshold.”The digital trust ledger provides these quantifiers. It allows you to shift the discussion from an operational cost center to a strategic resilience engine that protects market cap. I believe this strategic framing is what secures budget and earns a true seat at the C-suite table. It allows the CISO to move from being an emergency responder to a business growth enabler (a concept well-supported by Gartner’s latest CISO guidance).
The time for systemic change is now: I am not suggesting we dismantle our current GRC programs, but that we immediately overlay them with a GenAI-powered strategic layer. Waiting for a perfect solution is equivalent to accepting defeat. The supply chain has already been digitized and the risk has already been injected into your core systems.Your call to action is simple and immediate: Pilot the digital trust ledger concept now. Start small by using GenAI to monitor the difference between vendor self-attestations and their public digital footprint. Identify the four or five critical vendors whose failure would halt your business entirely. Make them your pilot project.The supply chain is a web of dependencies woven from code, data and human judgment. If we do not leverage generative intelligence to navigate this complexity, we are passively waiting for the next systemic failure. I urge you to lead this change and ensure your resilience strategy reflects the pace of the modern threat landscape explore regulatory changes related to critical infrastructure for context. Transform GRC from a compliance burden into a predictive safeguard, moving your strategic defense from the code to the boardroom today.This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.Want to join?
First seen on csoonline.com
Jump to article: https://www.csoonline.com/article/4094519/from-code-to-boardroom-a-genai-grc-approach-to-supply-chain-risk.html
First seen on csoonline.com
Jump to article: https://www.csoonline.com/article/4094519/from-code-to-boardroom-a-genai-grc-approach-to-supply-chain-risk.html
