What’s in a reporting line?: Aaron Painter, CEO of security vendor Nametag, contends that reporting structures often mean less than the respect the CISO is granted.Painter is “less dogmatic about where the CISO reports and more focused on whether they actually have a seat at the table,” he says.”Org charts matter far less than influence,” he adds. “Whether the CISO reports to the CIO, the CEO, or someone else, the real question is this: Are they brought in early, listened to, and empowered to shape how the business operates? When that’s true, the structure works. When it’s not, no reporting line will save it.”Sanchit Vir Gogia, chief analyst at Greyhound Research, argues that the trend to have CISOs report to an IT executive “is one of the most structurally damaging legacy habits still entrenched in enterprise security governance.””On paper, it may seem like a clean alignment,” he says. “In practice, it’s a governance anti-pattern that quietly erodes the CISO’s ability to surface truth, escalate risk, and hold the organization accountable. Keeping security under IT may seem convenient, but in today’s threat landscape, it is a structural vulnerability disguised as tradition.”Like others, Gogia’s argument falls back to the potential for conflicts of interest.”The CIO’s job is to enable business through technology. Innovation, delivery, velocity. The CISO’s job is to identify and mitigate risk, even when that slows things down,” Gogia says. “When the CISO reports to the CIO, risk can be filtered, prioritized out of sight, or reshaped to fit a delivery narrative. It’s not about bad actors. It’s about role tension. And when that tension exists within the same reporting line, risk loses.”Moreover, Gogia believes security reporting to IT “sends all the wrong cultural signals.””Employees know where power sits. If the CISO is three levels below the CFO, nobody takes their escalation seriously. If the CISO needs to ask their boss’s permission to flag a critical control gap, that’s not empowerment; it’s containment. Over time, the organization learns to route security around the CISO, not through them,” he says. “What matters most is unfiltered visibility and the freedom to present uncomfortable truths without career penalty.”Gogia argues in favor of a better reporting structure for cybersecurity. “We’re seeing the emergence of the chief digital risk officer (CDRO) model, which reframes the role altogether. Rather than being a technologist reporting into infrastructure, the CDRO is a senior executive responsible for digital risk across cyber, data, AI, and third-party exposure,” Gogia says. “This role often sits beside the CRO and CFO, not below them. It reflects the reality that digital risk is not a subset of IT. It is a board-level category in its own right.”
First seen on csoonline.com
Jump to article: www.csoonline.com/article/4136293/its-time-to-rethink-ciso-reporting-lines.html
