URL has been copied successfully!
Copy Fail (CVE-2026-31431): Frequently asked questions about Linux kernel privilege escalation vulnerability
URL has been copied successfully!

Collecting Cyber-News from over 60 sources

Copy Fail (CVE-2026-31431): Frequently asked questions about Linux kernel privilege escalation vulnerability

A flaw in the Linux kernel present since 2017 allows a local user to gain root access on virtually every major Linux distribution. A public exploit is available and reported to work reliably.

Key Takeaways

    CVE-2026-31431 is a high severity local privilege escalation vulnerability in the Linux kernel reportedly affecting virtually every major distribution released since 2017.
      A public exploit is available and reported to be reliable, drawing comparisons to previous high-profile Linux kernel privilege escalation flaws.
      Patched kernel versions are available, though some major distributions have not yet shipped updates.

Background

Tenable’s Research Special Operations (RSO) team has compiled this blog to answer Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding CVE-2026-31431, a Linux kernel local privilege escalation vulnerability dubbed “Copy Fail.”

FAQ

When was Copy Fail first disclosed? On March 23, researcher Taeyang Lee of Theori reported the vulnerability to the Linux kernel security team. The flaw was discovered in part using Theori’s AI-assisted security scanning tool, Xint Code. A mainline patch was committed on April 1, CVE-2026-31431 was assigned on April 22 and public disclosure occurred on April 29. What is CVE-2026-31431? CVE-2026-31431 is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the Linux kernel’s cryptographic subsystem. It was assigned a CVSSv3 score of 7.8.

CVE Description CVSSv3
CVE-2026-31431 Linux Kernel Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability 7.8

The flaw allows a local user to modify the kernel’s cached copy of a file in memory without changing the file on disk. By targeting a privileged binary, an attacker can gain root access. Because the modification exists only in the page cache, the underlying file on disk remains unchanged. Standard disk forensics would not detect the alteration, and clearing memory through a reboot or resource pressure causes the cache to reload from the original file. For a detailed technical breakdown, refer to the Xint Code blog post.

Loading

Share via Email
Share on Facebook
Tweet on X (Twitter)
Share on Whatsapp
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Xing
Copy link