The language of risks and returns: Boards of directors make decisions considering concepts such as risk and return. These include financial risks, operational risks, and reputational risks for the company. Board members assess the probability, exposure, and impact of incidents in each of these areas. Accordingly, the CISO’s role is to clarify how a proposed investment reduces vulnerabilities, limits the impact of incidents, or increases infrastructure resilience.These discussions should outline cost models, scenarios for potential security breaches, recovery timelines after a cyberattack, and the business benefits. The goal should be to avoid downtime while speaking the language of the board of directors, without compromising technical integrity.
Consider shareholder value: The maturity level and mindsets of boards regarding cybersecurity vary considerably. Some supervisory boards react only after a major cyber incident or a failed audit. Others are much more proactive in their approach and require cybersecurity assessments as part of their market expansion or M&A activities. Still others incorporate cybersecurity into simulations and ask forward-looking questions about resilience in the face of potential attack scenarios.Understanding this level of maturity helps in adapting the communication strategy. A reactive board may need a clear explanation of the negative consequences. An informed board is more likely to expect quantifiable results and a roadmap. The best board discussions occur when the CISO adapts to the board’s understanding of technology while carefully broadening its perspective.
Positioning operational excellence as an outcome: One of the most effective arguments in discussions with the board regarding cybersecurity is operational excellence. When companies operate in different regions and industries, they must work agilely, securely, and with control. An IT architecture should:
Address global requirementsSupport employees who work from anywhereIntegrate third partiesMeet a number of regulatory requirementsProtect intellectual propertySuch a comprehensive set of requirements can very quickly lead to complex implementation and, consequently, inefficiencies. CISOs, with a strong technology strategy, focus on a simplified infrastructure, enabling secure global data flows and shortening time to market. This positioning elevates the discussion from system selection to a strategic level.
Focus on future risks: A board of directors is expected to focus not only on current risks but also on future scenarios. These include, for example, regulating the ethical use of AI, understanding the impact of data misuse, and preparing for the effects of quantum computing. The board will be responsible and even held liable for the secure and regulated handling of data. These are no longer abstract issues. Therefore, they should already be on the CISO’s agenda as future technological challenges.The use of AI has increased in companies, and executives are now responsible for data usage. While quantum computing is still in its early stages, the risks this future technology poses to today’s encryption methods already make it a necessary component of any long-term planning. Many CISOs are already seizing the opportunity to raise the issue with the board and explain what measures will be necessary to protect data in the foreseeable future.
The power of numbers: The financial structure is just as important as the strategic approach. As companies continue to move from hardware-intensive architectures to cloud-native SaaS models, the economics of security are changing. Costs are shifting from capital expenditures to operating expenses. While this may initially lead to a decrease in EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization), it also eliminates hardware replacement cycles, improves forecast accuracy, and reduces long-term total cost of ownership.Per-user billing models for cloud services ensure predictability and greater flexibility in responding to changes. Further savings potential lies in consolidating tools onto a few platform providers. Additionally, process automation can reduce the burden on the service desk and improve productivity.Ultimately, CISOs should demonstrate how potential investments in new technologies will improve cash flow, safeguard margins, and scale with business growth. CFOs and audit committees want to know how each proposal will impact financial results. They also want to understand what can be capitalized, what offsetting effects to expect, and how the investments will align with demand.
Conclusion: Ultimately, justifying security investments isn’t about persuasion, but about exerting influence. It’s about aligning business priorities with secure, scalable, and cost-effective solutions.Accordingly, CISOs must present a strategy that reduces risks, improves agility, and positions the company for long-term success. When IT leadership speaks the language of added value in their solutions, their proposals no longer sound like technical requirements, but like business necessities.
Address global requirementsSupport employees who work from anywhereIntegrate third partiesMeet a number of regulatory requirementsProtect intellectual propertySuch a comprehensive set of requirements can very quickly lead to complex implementation and, consequently, inefficiencies. CISOs, with a strong technology strategy, focus on a simplified infrastructure, enabling secure global data flows and shortening time to market. This positioning elevates the discussion from system selection to a strategic level.
Focus on future risks: A board of directors is expected to focus not only on current risks but also on future scenarios. These include, for example, regulating the ethical use of AI, understanding the impact of data misuse, and preparing for the effects of quantum computing. The board will be responsible and even held liable for the secure and regulated handling of data. These are no longer abstract issues. Therefore, they should already be on the CISO’s agenda as future technological challenges.The use of AI has increased in companies, and executives are now responsible for data usage. While quantum computing is still in its early stages, the risks this future technology poses to today’s encryption methods already make it a necessary component of any long-term planning. Many CISOs are already seizing the opportunity to raise the issue with the board and explain what measures will be necessary to protect data in the foreseeable future.
The power of numbers: The financial structure is just as important as the strategic approach. As companies continue to move from hardware-intensive architectures to cloud-native SaaS models, the economics of security are changing. Costs are shifting from capital expenditures to operating expenses. While this may initially lead to a decrease in EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization), it also eliminates hardware replacement cycles, improves forecast accuracy, and reduces long-term total cost of ownership.Per-user billing models for cloud services ensure predictability and greater flexibility in responding to changes. Further savings potential lies in consolidating tools onto a few platform providers. Additionally, process automation can reduce the burden on the service desk and improve productivity.Ultimately, CISOs should demonstrate how potential investments in new technologies will improve cash flow, safeguard margins, and scale with business growth. CFOs and audit committees want to know how each proposal will impact financial results. They also want to understand what can be capitalized, what offsetting effects to expect, and how the investments will align with demand.
Conclusion: Ultimately, justifying security investments isn’t about persuasion, but about exerting influence. It’s about aligning business priorities with secure, scalable, and cost-effective solutions.Accordingly, CISOs must present a strategy that reduces risks, improves agility, and positions the company for long-term success. When IT leadership speaks the language of added value in their solutions, their proposals no longer sound like technical requirements, but like business necessities.
Conclusion: Ultimately, justifying security investments isn’t about persuasion, but about exerting influence. It’s about aligning business priorities with secure, scalable, and cost-effective solutions.Accordingly, CISOs must present a strategy that reduces risks, improves agility, and positions the company for long-term success. When IT leadership speaks the language of added value in their solutions, their proposals no longer sound like technical requirements, but like business necessities.
First seen on csoonline.com
Jump to article: www.csoonline.com/article/4104472/how-to-justify-your-security-investments.html
